如何用創新的(新+長期)資產賺錢 / How to make money with innovation's long-term assets

2021-12-29·42 分鐘

本集介紹

小額贊助支持本節目: https://pay.firstory.me/user/cki7h5zxajbdp08606zzrytfy
Some companies treat patents as an after-thought. Why does Matt think this is leaving money on the table?

Samsung has a stronger patent portfolio than Apple. How did Apple prevail in the Samsung vs. Apple patents battle at the end?

Conversely, HTC was in the PDA phone business before the first smartphone was made. How did Apple win in the Apple vs. HTC case?

Motorola and Nokia, how did they use their patent portfolios to remain relevant in the global stage even after their commercial products no longer shined?

Although there is no one single path to patent portfolio success, Matt offers some practical insights on using patents as assets to propel long-term success.

About Matt Chen:
陳志光。臺灣大學電機工程學士,臺灣大學科際整合法律研究所碩士,美國史丹佛大學法學碩士(LL.M.),美國紐約州律師。

曾任職美國 Finnegan Henderson 和 Jones Day 兩家跨國律師事務所臺北分所,台灣半導體公司法務部智慧財產處,目前任職於深圳騰訊科技知識產權部擔任知識產權專家律師,主要負責處理公司之海外跨國智慧財產及出口管制合規相關事務。

image and info sources
- Matt's personal archive
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung_Electronics_Co.
- https://www.theguardian.com/technology/askjack/2020/jan/09/how-do-i-find-a-smartphone-with-the-specifications-i-really-want
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola

#TUX
#Innovation
#Patent
#AssetClass
#謝伯伯時間
#創新
#專利
#資產

Powered by Firstory Hosting